How do investors judge the risk of financial items?

  • Koonce L
  • McAnally M
  • Mercer M
  • 65


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 45


    Citations of this article.


This paper proposes and tests a risk model that explains how investors perceive financial risks. The model combines conventional decision-theory variables— probabilities and outcomes—with behavioral variables from psychology research by Slovic (1987), such as the extent to which a risky item is new, causes worry, and is controllable. To test our model, we conduct two studies in which M.B.A. students judge the risk of a broad range of financial items. Our results indicate that both the decision-theory variables and Slovic's (1987) behavioral variables are important in explaining investors' risk judgments. Further, we demonstrate that information about the amount of potential loss outcome contained within mandated risk disclosures not only directly influences risk judgments, but also indirectly affects such judgments via its effect on some of Slovic's (1987) behavioral variables. By identifying this unintended conse-quence of current risk disclosures, these results have the potential to influence the way accounting regulators, firm managers, and academic researchers think about risk disclosure.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Decision theory
  • Psychology
  • Risk disclosure
  • Risk perception

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text


  • Lisa Koonce

  • Mary Lea McAnally

  • Molly Mercer

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free