The job demands-resources model and counterproductive work behaviour: The role of job-related affect

  • Balducci C
  • Schaufeli W
  • Fraccaroli F
  • 4


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A


    Citations of this article.


The Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model postulates that job demands and job resources constitute two processes: the health impairment process, leading to negative outcomes, and the motivational process, leading to positive outcomes. In the current research we extended the JD-R model by including both counterproductive work behaviour (CWB) as a behavioural stressreaction and job-related affect as a mediator in both processes. In a sample of 818 public-sector employees we found support for a model where job demands (workload, role conflict, and interpersonal demands) were associated with abuse/hostility CWB, whereas job resources (decision authority, social support, and promotion prospects) were associated with work engagement. Furthermore, job-related negative affect mediated the relationship between job demands and abuse/hostility CWB, whereas job-related positive affect mediated the relationship between job resources and work engagement. We also found that the impact of job demands on negative affect was attenuated by job resources. © 2011 Psychology Press.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Abuse/hostility
  • Counterproductive work behaviour
  • Job demands-resources model
  • Job-related affect
  • Work engagement

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in


  • C Balducci

  • W B Schaufeli

  • F Fraccaroli

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free