Jockeying for position: What it means and why it matters to regional development policy when places compete

  • Maleckia E
  • 83


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 2


    Citations of this article.


Competitiveness of regions from an evolutionary perspective, Regional Studies 38, 993-1006. Do regions compete, as firms do? How does one deal with the fact that regions, urJike organizations, are entities that do not act? Does it make sense to talk about the ability of regions to generate new variety? This paper aims to address these questions from an evolutionary perspective. It is meaningful to talk about regional competitiveness when the region affects the performances of local firms to a considerable degree. This is especially true when the competitiveness of a region depends on intangible, non-tradable assets based on a knowledge and competence base embedded in a particular institutional setting that are reproduced and modified through the actions and repeated interactions of actors. Although regions are increasingly becoming collective players actively responding to an increasing exposure to extra-regional competition, the paper explains why there are serious limits in enhancing the competitiveness of regions. By doing so, it questions the usefulness of benchmarking practices with the purpose of improving regional competitiveness: there exists no 'optimal' development model, it is difficult to copy or imitate a successful model from elsewhere, and new trajectories often emerge spontaneously and unexpectedly in space. Evolutionary

Author-supplied keywords

  • Competition
  • Knowledge
  • Policy
  • Regional development
  • World cities

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text


  • Edward J. Maleckia

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free