Judging the 'weight of evidence' in systematic reviews: Introducing rigour into the qualitative overview stage by assessing signal and noise

  • Edwards A
  • Elwyn G
  • Hood K
 et al. 
  • 33

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 38

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

The 'weight of evidence' in a topic area can be judged by assessing the 'Signal' from available research publications and tempering the importance attached by the level of 'Noise' (the inverse of methodological quality). This assessment process has validity and reliability and can be applied to the 'qualitative overview' stage of systematic reviews. This enables the important themes and areas of relevance to the research question to be identified. Important findings from individual papers may also be identified providing further information which may not be evident from quantitative analysis. The findings from these more qualitative stages of analysis complement, but do not replace, quantitative analysis.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Evidence
  • Noise
  • Qualitative analysis
  • Rigour
  • Signal
  • Systematic reviews

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Glyn ElwynDartmouth College Geisel School of Medicine

    Follow
  • Adrian Edwards

  • Kerry Hood

  • Stephen Rollnick

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free