On knowing what we do not know: An empirical comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis

  • Kromrey J
  • Rendina-Gobioff G
  • 2

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

The performance of methods for detecting publication bias in meta-analysis was evaluated using Monte Carlo methods. Four methods of bias detection were investigated: Begg's rank correlation, Egger's regression, funnel plot regression, and trim and fill. Five factors were included in the simulation design: number of primary studies in each meta-analysis, sample sizes of primary studies, population variances in primary studies, magnitude of population effect size, and magnitude of selection bias. Results were evaluated in terms of Type I error control and statistical power. Results suggest poor Type I error control in many conditions for all of the methods examined. One exception was the Begg's rank correlation method using sample size rather than the estimated variance. Statistical power was typically very low for conditions in which Type I error rates were adequately controlled, although power increased with larger sample sizes in the primary studies and larger numbers of studies in the meta-analysis. © 2006 Sage Publications.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Detection
  • Effect size
  • Meta-analysis
  • Publication bias
  • Simulation

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • J D Kromrey

  • G Rendina-Gobioff

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free