Lack of gender difference in motion sickness induced by vestibular Coriolis cross-coupling.

  • Cheung B
  • Hofer K
  • 10


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 27


    Citations of this article.


It has been reported that females are more susceptible to motion sickness than males. Supporting evidence is primarily based on retrospective survey questionnaires and self-reporting. We investigated if there is a gender difference in motion sickness susceptibility using objective and subjective measurements under controlled laboratory conditions. Thirty healthy subjects (14 males and 16 females) between the ages of 18-46 years were exposed to Coriolis cross-coupling stimulation, induced by 120 degrees /s yaw rotation and a simultaneous 45 degrees pitch forward head movement in the sagittal plane every 12 seconds. Cutaneous forearm and calf blood flow, blood pressure, and heart rate were monitored. Graybiel's diagnostic criteria were used to assess sickness susceptibility before and after motion exposure. Golding and Kerguelen's scale was used to assess the severity of symptoms during motion exposure. A significant (p

Author-supplied keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Coriolis Force
  • Disease Susceptibility
  • Female
  • Forearm
  • Humans
  • Leg
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Motion Sickness
  • Motion Sickness: etiology
  • Motion Sickness: physiopathology
  • Reference Values
  • Regional Blood Flow
  • Self-Assessment
  • Sex Factors
  • Skin
  • Skin: blood supply
  • Vestibule, Labyrinth
  • Vestibule, Labyrinth: physiology

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

  • PMID: 12897401
  • SCOPUS: 2-s2.0-0041528379
  • SGR: 0041528379
  • PUI: 36981400
  • ISSN: 0957-4271


  • Bob Cheung

  • Kevin Hofer

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free