Loyalty in business?

21Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Discussions of loyalty in business typically assume that employees have a prima facie duty of loyalty to their companies, one that sometimes conflicts with other duties, such as the duty to blow the whistle in response to dangerous or unethical practices. Ronald Duska, however, denies the existence of any such duty. According to Duska, one does not have an duty of loyalty to a company, even a prima facie one, because companies are not proper objects of loyalty. He bases this conclusion on two premises: first, that loyalty is appropriate only in relationships that demand self sacrifice without expectation of reward, and second, that the employee-company relationship does not demand such sacrifice. In this paper I pose a dilemma for Duska. Briefly put: one can interpret Duska's phrase "relationships that demand self-sacrifice without expectation of reward" either narrowly or broadly. If one interprets it narrowly, then Duska's first premise is false; if broadly, then his second premise is false. Either way, Duska's argument is unsound. However, after rejecting his conclusion about loyalty in business, I go on to argue that Duska is right to deny that the duty of loyalty conflicts with the duty to blow the whistle. More generally, the paper is an attempt to elucidate the proper application of loyalty in business.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Corvino, J. (2002). Loyalty in business? Journal of Business Ethics, 41(1–2), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021370727220

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free