Lung and chest wall mechanics in anesthetized children: Influence of body position

  • Ingimarsson J
  • Thorsteinsson A
  • Larsson A
 et al. 
  • 21


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 17


    Citations of this article.


The mechanical behavior of the lung and chest wall has not been determined in preschool children. We therefore obtained static expiratory pressure-volume (P-V) curves of the respiratory system, partitioned into lung and chest wall components using esophageal (Pes) and airway pressure (Paw) registration in 17 anesthetized children (0.2 to 15.5 yr) in the supine and lateral position. From the P-V curves the inspiratory capacity (IC), the chest wall elastance (Ecw), and the maximal compliance of the respiratory system (Crs) and lungs (C(lung)) were calculated and related to growth. At IC (Paw = 30 cm H(2)O), Pes was the same in the two positions: 11 +/- 3 cm H(2)O. In contrast, at end-expiration (Paw = 0), Pes was close to zero in the lateral position, but markedly positive in the supine position (7 +/- 2 cm H(2)O). C(lung) was similar in both positions and increased with growth. Thus, C(lung) in the lateral position (ml/cm H(2)O) = 0.0017 x length(2.26) (cm), r(2) = 0.90. Crs and IC were approximately 20% greater (p /= 0.93) with power functions of length in both positions. Ecw expressed as a fraction of total respiratory system elastance (Ecw/Ers) was 33 +/- 12% in the lateral position and 12 +/- 16% supine (p < 0.001). We conclude that the respiratory mechanics in children correlated closely with body size and showed important differences between the supine and lateral positions.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • J. Ingimarsson

  • A. Thorsteinsson

  • A. Larsson

  • O. Werner

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free