What Makes a Good Scientist?: Determinants of Peer Evaluation among Biologists

  • Sonnert G
  • 39


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 53


    Citations of this article.


To explore the criteria US biologists use to evaluate their peers' scientific performance, 6 distinguished biology professors were asked to rate 42 former National Science Foundation postdoctoral Fellows on the basis of their curriculum vitae & bibliography. The most powerful predictor of these quality judgments was the rated scientist's annual productivity rate: this explained more than 40% of the variance in the evaluators' judgments. 4 Tables. Adapted from the source document.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text


  • Gerhard Sonnert

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free