Making genetics not so important: Family work in dealing with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

26Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The literature shows that genetic testing could stimulate solidarity among family members, but also lead to major conflicts. To prevent negative effects, clinical geneticists and ethicists have stressed the importance of 'good communication' within families. In this qualitative study, we followed six extended families in the southern and eastern Netherlands involved in genetic testing for familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy for three and a half years. In total 57 members of these families were interviewed in depth, most more than once. Our analysis shows that genetic testing does affect families, but that families perform a lot of 'balancing work' in order to prevent genetic testing from becoming too all-encompassing. There is much more continuity in family life than is often thought. Moreover, as these families demonstrate different styles of family work, establishing a single norm of 'good communication' in clinical genetics might in fact be more harmful for family life than genetic testing itself. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Geelen, E., Van Hoyweghen, I., & Horstman, K. (2011). Making genetics not so important: Family work in dealing with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Social Science and Medicine, 72(11), 1752–1759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.06.012

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free