Making genetics not so important: Family work in dealing with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

  • Geelen E
  • Van Hoyweghen I
  • Horstman K
  • 28


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 18


    Citations of this article.


The literature shows that genetic testing could stimulate solidarity among family members, but also lead to major conflicts. To prevent negative effects, clinical geneticists and ethicists have stressed the importance of 'good communication' within families. In this qualitative study, we followed six extended families in the southern and eastern Netherlands involved in genetic testing for familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy for three and a half years. In total 57 members of these families were interviewed in depth, most more than once. Our analysis shows that genetic testing does affect families, but that families perform a lot of 'balancing work' in order to prevent genetic testing from becoming too all-encompassing. There is much more continuity in family life than is often thought. Moreover, as these families demonstrate different styles of family work, establishing a single norm of 'good communication' in clinical genetics might in fact be more harmful for family life than genetic testing itself. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Communication
  • Familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
  • Family work
  • Genetic testing
  • New genetics
  • The Netherlands

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Els Geelen

  • Ine Van Hoyweghen

  • Klasien Horstman

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free