The management of international waters in EU and SADC compared

6Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The paper draws on an international conference on the Management of Shared River Basins that was held in Maseru in May 1997 among representatives of SADC and EU member states. It uses the model of the 'classical temple' to analyse a number of case studies: the Zambezi, the Orange, the Incomati, the Limpopo, the Rhine, the Meuse and the Danube. The temple has as its foundation Integrated Water Resources Management. The roof, the shared management of international waters, is supported by three essential pillars that need to be level and equally strong: the political, institutional/legal and operational/technical pillars. It is concluded that the technical/operational pillar is central and crucial to build the temple and to keep it erect in periods of political or institutional instability.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van der Zaag, P., & Savenije, H. (1999). The management of international waters in EU and SADC compared. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part B: Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere, 24(6), 579–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1464-1909(99)00048-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free