I review but don't endorse Marcus' arguments that impossible beliefs are impossible. I defend her claim that belief's objects are, in some important sense, not the bearers of truth and falsity, discuss her dispositionalism about belief, and argue it's a good fit with the idea that belief's objects are Russellian states of affairs.
CITATION STYLE
Richard, M. (2013). Marcus on belief and belief in the impossible. Theoria (Spain), 28(3), 407–420. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.7102
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.