Market processes and the closing of 'industrial loops': A historical reappraisal

  • Desrochers P
  • 28

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 40

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Many industrial ecologists assume that traditional economic development was characterized by a linear approach in which materials and energy were extracted, processed, used, and dumped in a linear flow into, through, and out of the economy. Much historical evidence, however, indicates that industrial resource recovery was much more widespread than currently thought. This article reviews the available evidence by introducing the reader to earlier literature on the topic and by providing a short case study of animal by-products recovery from the Neolithic period to the middle of the twentieth century. The main finding of this article is that the belief that market actors systematically failed to close “industrial loops” in earlier eras is inaccurate. Furthermore, it is pointed out that the industrial ecology metaphor was actually well understood in the middle of the nineteenth century.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Animal by-products
  • Closed loops
  • Industrial symbiosis
  • Market failure
  • Peter Lund Simmonds
  • Resource recovery

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Pierre Desrochers

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free