Marketing Expenditures and Word-of-Mouth Communication: Complements or Substitutes?

  • Armelini G
  • 9

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 2

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

In this monograph we examine the extent to which word-of-mouth communication (WOM) plays a complementary and/or substitute role with regard to advertising. A review of the existing literature reveals the main similarities and differences between these constructs.We also examine the conditions in which a social contagion process is most likely. Specifically, our literature review helps us answer the following questions: whetherWOMcomplements the advertising effect, when and howWOM can be a substitute of the marketing effort, and which issues limit WOM’s ability to inform and persuade consumers. Published empirical evidence suggests that in most cases WOM complements advertising; however, three marketing strategies — viral marketing, referral reward programs, and a firm’s creation of exogenous WOM — might work without advertising. This monograph concludes with a list of unanswered questions of potential interest to both researchers and managers.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Guillermo Armelini

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free