Marketing expenditures and word-of-mouth communication: Complements or substitutes?

7Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this monograph we examine the extent to which word-of-mouth communication (WOM) plays a complementary and/or substitute role with regard to advertising. A review of the existing literature reveals the main similarities and differences between these constructs. We also examine the conditions in which a social contagion process is most likely. Specifically, our literature review helps us answer the following questions: whetherWOM complements the advertising effect, when and how WOM can be a substitute of the marketing effort, and which issues limit WOM's ability to inform and persuade consumers. Published empirical evidence suggests that in most cases WOM complements advertising; however, three marketing strategies - viral marketing, referral reward programs, and a firm's creation of exogenous WOM - might work without advertising. This monograph concludes with a list of unanswered questions of potential interest to both researchers and managers.© 2010 G. Armelini and J. Villanueva.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Armelini, G., & Villanueva, J. (2010). Marketing expenditures and word-of-mouth communication: Complements or substitutes? Foundations and Trends in Marketing, 5(1), 1–53. https://doi.org/10.1561/1700000025

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free