Does the measure of dispersion matter in multilevel research?: A comparison of the relative performance of dispersion indexes

  • Roberson Q
  • Sturman M
  • Simons T
  • 130

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 51

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Within the context of climate strength, this simulation study examines the validity of various dispersion indexes for detecting meaningful relationships between variability in group member perceptions and outcome variables. We used the simulation to model both individual-and group-level phenomena, vary appropriate population characteristics, and test the proclivity of standard and average deviation, interrater agreement indexes (rwg, r*wg, awg), and coefficient of variation (both normed and unnormed) for Type I and Type II errors. The results show that the coefficient of variation was less likely to detect interaction effects although it outperformed other measures when detecting level effects. Standard deviation was shown to be inferior to other indexes when no level effect is present although it may be an effective measure of dispersion when modeling strength or interaction effects. The implications for future research, in which dispersion is a critical component of the theoretical model, are discussed.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Agreement
  • Climate strength
  • Dispersion
  • Multilevel

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text

Authors

  • Quinetta M. Roberson

  • Michael C. Sturman

  • Tony L. Simons

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free