Measurement of Vitamin D metabolites: An international perspective on methodology and clinical interpretation

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The International Quality Assessment Scheme for Vitamin D metabolites (DEQAS) was introduced in 1989. Initially, the aim was to improve the reliability of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) assays but the scheme was extended in 1997 to include 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D). DEQAS has 95 members in 18 countries (January 2003). Five serum samples are distributed quarterly and participants are given up to 6 weeks to return their results for statistical analysis. The majority of participants use commercial kits for both analytes. A performance target was set by an advisory panel in 1997 and, at present, requires participants to get 80% or more of their results within ±30% of the All-Laboratory Trimmed Mean (ALTM). The performance targets are under continual review. In 2003, 59% of participants met the target (cf. 52% in 2000). A questionnaire, distributed in January 2003, requested information on methods and the interpretation of results. Reference ranges varied but there was reasonable agreement on the 25-OHD concentrations below which Vitamin D supplementation was advised. A minority (22%) of respondents was unsure whether Vitamin D3 or Vitamin D2 was used to treat patients in their locality. The majority (52%) of assays for 1,25(OH)2D were done 'on demand' and others for apparently spurious reasons. Most respondents thought participation in DEQAS extremely important and the planned introduction of on-line reporting should enhance its value. © 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carter, G. D., Carter, C. R., Gunter, E., Jones, J., Jones, G., Makin, H. L. J., & Sufi, S. (2004). Measurement of Vitamin D metabolites: An international perspective on methodology and clinical interpretation. In Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (Vol. 89–90, pp. 467–471). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2004.03.055

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free