Medical ethics and the interrogation of Guantanamo 063

35Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The controversy over abusive interrogations of prisoners during the war against terrorism spotlights the need for clear ethics norms requiring physicians and other clinicians to prevent the mistreatment of prisoners. Although policies and general descriptions pertaining to clinical oversight of interrogations in United States' war on terror prisons have come to light, there are few public records detailing the clinical oversight of an interrogation. A complaint by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) led to an Army investigation of an interrogation at the United States prison at Guantanamo Bay. The declassified Army investigation and the corresponding interrogation log show clinical supervision, monitoring and treatment during an interrogation that employed dogs, prolonged sleep deprivation, humiliation, restraint, hypothermia and compulsory intravenous infusions. The interrogation and the involvement of a psychologist, physician and medics violate international and medical norms for the treatment of prisoners. Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Miles, S. H. (2007, April). Medical ethics and the interrogation of Guantanamo 063. American Journal of Bioethics. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265160701263535

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free