Mental practice and the retention of motor learning: A pilot study

10Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study compared the effects of mental practice, physical practice, and no practice on the performance and retention of a novel throwing task. Research supports the effectiveness of mental practice on performance; however, retention of learning has not been adequately investigated. Participants were 152 students ages 18 to 44 years (M = 20.5, SD = 2.9), who completed a pretest, posttest, and five-week delayed retention test of dart throwing with the nonpreferred hand. In the practice phase, participants completed 50 mental practice or physical practice trials of the darts task or 50 trials of a catching task. Results indicated that overall scores increased from pretest to posttest and retention test, and decreased from posttest to retention test, but that these effects did not differ for type of practice. The findings suggest equal learning and retention of learning for novel throwing tasks for control, mental practice, and physical practice conditions; however, further research that considers issues raised is recommended. © Perceptual and Motor Skills 2010.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Spittle, M., & Kremer, P. (2010). Mental practice and the retention of motor learning: A pilot study. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 110(3), 888–896. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.110.3.888-896

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free