Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: III. Family history, actinic damage and phenotypic factors

  • Gandini S
  • Sera F
  • Cattaruzza M
 et al. 
  • 162


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 354


    Citations of this article.


A systematic meta-analysis of observational studies of melanoma and family history, actinic damage and phenotypic factors was conducted as part of a comprehensive meta-analysis of all major risk factors for melanoma. Following a systematic literature search, relative risks were extracted from 60 studies published before September 2002. Fixed and random effects models were used to obtain pooled estimates for family history (RR = 1.74, 1.41-2.14), skin type (I vs. IV: RR = 2.09, 1.67-2.58), high density of freckles (RR = 2.10, 1.80-2.45), skin colour (Fair vs. Dark: RR = 2.06, 1.68-2.52), eye colour (Blue vs. Dark: RR = 1.47, 1.28-1.69) and hair colour (Red vs. Dark: RR = 3.64, 2.56-5.37), pre-malignant and skin cancer lesions (RR = 4.28, 2.80-6.55) and actinic damage indicators (RR = 2.02, 1.24-3.29). Sub-group analysis and meta-regression were carried out to explore sources of between-study variation and bias. Sensitivity analyses investigated reliability of results and publication bias. Latitude and adjustment for phenotype were two study characteristics that significantly influenced the estimates. © 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Actinic damage
  • Epidemiology
  • Family history
  • Melanoma
  • Meta-analysis
  • Phenotype
  • Review literature

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text


  • Sara Gandini

  • Francesco Sera

  • Maria Sofia Cattaruzza

  • Paolo Pasquini

  • Roberto Zanetti

  • Cinzia Masini

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free