Methodolatry and qualitative health research

152Citations
Citations of this article
233Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The increasing turn to qualitative research in health psychology raises a number of issues about the appropriate use and relevance of qualitative methods in this field. In this article I raise concerns about methodolatry: the privileging of methodological concerns over other considerations in qualitative health research. I argue that qualitative researchers are in danger of reifying methods in the same way as their colleagues in quantitative research have done for some time. Reasons for the pre-eminence of methods are discussed briefly and their consequences consider latter include: a concern with 'proper' or 'correct' methods; a focus on description at the expense of interpretation; a concern with issues of validity and generalizability; an avoidance of theory; an avoidance of the critical; and the stance of the researcher. I offer some suggestions for avoiding methodolatry and some opinions on how we might develop and use qualitative research more effectively in health psychology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chamberlain, K. (2000). Methodolatry and qualitative health research. In Journal of Health Psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 285–296). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910530000500306

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free