Methodological emotional reflexivity: The role of researcher emotions in grounded theory research

  • Munkejord K
  • 47

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 4

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to analyse the role of emotions in fieldwork by applying grounded theory (GT). Although analytical guidelines in GT are well documented, the implications of researcher emotions have received much less attention. Design/methodology/approach – This paper provides an “insider” account of the author’s experience collecting field data during six months in a department of a Fortune 500 company. Findings – It is argued that methodological emotional reflexivity (MER) as a part of doing GT will increase both awareness and understanding about how emotions influence the research process. MER comprises emotional awareness, empathic understanding and emotions in decision making. Originality/value – The paper proposes acknowledging that emotions are part of, connected to, and both influence and are influenced by research decisions within GT. It is suggested thatMERbecomes an integral part of memoing in GT. Memos provides a link between data and evolving insights, and is considered fundamental in GT. The inclusion of MER provides a more transparent and adaptive GT approach.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Emotional intelligence
  • Research work

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Keith Munkejord

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free