Minimal replicability, generalizability, and scientific advances in psychological science.

  • Cacioppo J
  • Cacioppo S
  • 9


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A


    Citations of this article.


With the growing number of fraudulent and nonreplicable reports in psychological science, many question the replicability of experiments performed in laboratories worldwide. The focus of Asendorpf and colleagues is on research practices that investigators may be using to increase the likelihood of publication while unknowingly undermining replicability. We laud them for thoughtful intentions and extend their recommendations by focusing on two additional domains: the structure of psychological science and the need to distinguish between minimal replicability and generalizability. The former represents a methodological/statistical problem, whereas the latter represents a theoretical opportunity.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • John T. Cacioppo

  • Stephanie Cacioppo

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free