Skip to content
Journal article

Modeling and evaluation of the global sea-salt aerosol distribution: Sensitivity to emission schemes and resolution effects at coastal/orographic sites

Spada M, Jorba O, Pérez García-Pando C, Janjic Z, Baldasano J ...see all

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, vol. 13, issue 23 (2013) pp. 11735-11755

  • 30

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 23

    Citations

    Citations of this article.
  • N/A

    Views

    ScienceDirect users who have downloaded this article.
Sign in to save reference

Abstract

One of the major sources of uncertainty in model estimates of the global sea-salt aerosol distribution is the emission parameterization. We evaluate a new sea-salt aerosol life cycle module coupled to the online multiscale chemical transport model NMMB/BSC-CTM. We compare 5 yr global simulations using five state-of-the-art sea-salt open-ocean emission schemes with monthly averaged coarse aerosol optical depth (AOD) from selected AERONET sun photometers, surface concentration measurements from the University of Miami’s Ocean Aerosol Network, and mea- surements from two NOAA/PMEL cruises (AEROINDOEX and ACE1). Model results are highly sensitive to the intro- duction of sea-surface-temperature (SST)-dependent emis- sions and to the accounting of spume particles production. Emission ranges from 3888 Tg yr−1 to 8114 Tg yr−1 , life- time varies between 7.3 h and 11.3 h, and the average col- umn mass load is between 5.0 Tg and 7.2 Tg. Coarse AOD is reproduced with an overall correlation of around 0.5 and with normalized biases ranging from +8.8 % to +38.8 %. Surface concentration is simulated with normalized biases ranging from −9.5 % to +28 % and the overall correlation is around 0.5. Our results indicate that SST-dependent emission schemes improve the overall model performance in repro- ducing surface concentrations. On the other hand, they lead to an overestimation of the coarse AOD at tropical latitudes, although it may be affected by uncertainties in the compar- ison due to the use of all-sky model AOD, the treatment of water uptake, deposition and optical properties in the model and/or an inaccurate size distribution at emission.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text

Authors

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below