Modeling Languages: Syntax, Semantics and All That Stuff - Part I: The Basic Stuff

  • Harel D
  • Rumpe B
  • 114

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

The motivation for this paper, the first in a planned series of three parts, is the multitude of concepts surrounding the proper definition of complex modeling languages for systems and software, and the confusion that this often causes. Particularly relevant is the case of the recently standardized UML, which we refer to quite extensively as we proceed. Our intention is to discuss and clarify the notions involved in defining modeling languages. The main theme is the distinction between syntax and semantics, the nature and purpose of each, their usage and style, and the various means for defining and dealing with them. Underlying the exposition are the dichotomies of textual vs. visual languages, structural vs. behavioral specification, and requirements vs. system models. We hope that the paper will be useful to language designers, methodologists, tool vendors and educators.

Author-supplied keywords

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • acm taxonomy
  • d
  • f
  • formality
  • language
  • modeling
  • semantics
  • syntax
  • uml

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • David Harel

  • Bernhard Rumpe

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free