Modeling vs. forecasting: The case of information systems spending

  • Gurbaxani V
  • Mendelson H
  • 26


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 7


    Citations of this article.


Collopy, Adya and Armstrong (1994)(CAA) advocate the use of atheoretical "black box" extrapolation techniques to forecast information systems spending. In this paper, we contrast this approach with the positive modeling approach of Gurbaxani and Mendelson (1990), where the primary focus is on explanation based on economics and innovation diffusion theory. We argue that the objectives and premises of extrapolation techniques are so fundamentally different from those of positive modeling that evaluation of positive models using the criteria of "black box" forecasting approaches is inadequate. We further show that even if one were to accept CAA's premises, their results are still inferior. Our results refute CAA's claim that linear trend extrapolations are appropriate for forecasting future IS spending and demonstrate the risks of ignoring the guidance of theory.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Exponential smoothing
  • Forecasting
  • Information systems spending
  • Positive models

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Vijay Gurbaxani

  • Haim Mendelson

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free