Modelling the salt rejection of nanofiltration membranes for ternary ion mixturs and for single salts at different pH values

  • Hagmeyer G
  • Gimbel R
  • 57


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 195


    Citations of this article.


Zeta potential measurements were performed to gain more insight in the rejection mechanisms of nanofiltration membranes. The zeta potential as well as the calculated surface charge increased at pH 7 with increasing salt concentration in the bulk. The isoelectric point of both membranes investigated (PVD1, Desal 5DK) is at a pH of about 4. The membranes are positively charged below this pH-value and are negative at higher pH-values. Rejection measurements were performed for both membranes. The rejection of single salt solutions at different concentrations, the rejection of ternary ion mixtures as well as the rejection at different pH-values were determined experimentally. For the modelling of the rejection by nanofiltration membranes, the zeta potential measurements were used to calculate the surface charge of the membrane. An empirical approach was proposed to incorporate the change of the dielectric constant between bulk and pore solution to calculate the iron distribution between bulk and pore solution. The decrease of the NaCl rejection as well as the increase of the CaCl2rejection was well described by the model. The rejection of ternary ion mixtures of NaCl/Na2SO4and NaCl/CaCl2were determined experimentally and were predicted by the model except for the NaCl/CaCl2mixture in the case of the Desal 5DK membrane, where the negative rejections of Na+were not predicted. The rejections at different pH-values exhibit a minimum, which coincides in the case of the PVD1 with the isoelectric point of the membrane surface. The pH of the rejection minimum for the Desal 5DK is one pH unit higher than the isoelectric point.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • G. Hagmeyer

  • R. Gimbel

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free