Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions.

  • Ditto P
  • Lopez D
  • 376

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 582

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Three experiments show that information consistent with a preferred conclusion is examined less critically than information inconsistent with a preferred conclusion, and consequently, less infor- mation is required to reach the former than the latter. In Study 1, Ss judged which of 2 students was most intelligent, believing they would work closely with the 1 they chose. Ss required less informa- tion to decide that a dislikable student was less intelligent than that he was more intelligent. In Studies 2 and 3, Ss given an unfavorable medical test result took longer to decide their test result was complete, were more likely to retest the validity of their result, cited more life irregularities that might have affected test accuracy, and rated test accuracy as lower than did Ss receiving more favorable diagnoses. Results suggest that a core component of self-serving bias is the differential quantity of cognitive processing given to preference-consistent and preference-inconsistent infor- mation. In

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text

Authors

  • Peter H. Ditto

  • David F. Lopez

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free