Skip to content
Journal article

The Motivation Assessment Scale: Reliability and construct validity across three topographies of behavior.

Duker P, Sigafoos J, Barron J, Coleman F ...see all

Research in Developmental Disabilities, vol. 19, issue 2 (1998) pp. 131-141

  • 3


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A


    Citations of this article.
  • N/A


    ScienceDirect users who have downloaded this article.
Sign in to save reference


Examined the psychometric properties of the Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS). Specifically, reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity were estimated using 90 ratings of different problem behaviors among 86 individuals with mental retardation. Data were analyzed under conditions of (1) 3 topographies of problem behavior and (2) 2 methods of calculation. Although reliability and internal consistency were generally poor, the results depended upon the above conditions. Factor analysis revealed that the 4 factors of the MAS differed from the subscale structure obtained in this study, proposed by the authors of the MAS. Thus, the construct validity of this scale was ambiguous. It is concluded that the MAS should be employed in conjunction with other instruments to assess the functional characteristics of problem behavior with individuals who have mental retardation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)

Author-supplied keywords

  • Aggressive Behavior
  • Behavior Problems
  • Intellectual Development Disorder
  • Rating Scales
  • Statistical Validity
  • Test Reliability
  • individuals with mental retardation
  • rating of problem behavior
  • reliability & internal consistency & construct val

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Pieter C Duker

  • Jeff Sigafoos

  • Joan Barron

  • Florence Coleman

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below