Motor nerve refractory period distribution assessed by two techniques in diabetic polyneuropathy

  • Ruijten M
  • De Haan G
  • Michels R
 et al. 
  • 3

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 9

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

The techniques introduced by Kimura and Ingram et al. were applied to assess the distribution of motor refractory periods (DMRPs) in peroneal fibres of 28 diabetics with symptoms indicating polyneuropathy and in 28 controls. Results were compared with conventional motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCV) and compound muscle action potential (CMAP) measurements. MRP95and MRP90(the 5% and 10% slowest recovering fibres) obtained with Ingram's technique were prolonged in the diabetic patients. In the 26 patients with a value of MRP95and MNCV, a prolonged MRP95and a decreased MNCV were found in 12 patients. Thus conventional MNCV had a sensitivity of 46% to detect neuropathy; addition of MRP95obtained with Ingram's technique raised the sensitivity to 73%. Specificity was 100% in both cases. With Kimura's technique or with the fast recovering fibres in Ingram's technique, it was not possible to discriminate the patients from the controls. This study indicates that measurement of the DMRP with the technique introduced by Ingram et al. improves the electrophysiological diagnosis of diabetic polyneuropathy. © 1994.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Collision neurography
  • Diabetic polyneuropathy
  • Motor neurones
  • Nerve conduction
  • Nerve recovery
  • Nerve refractory period

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free