Mountain Regions: A Global Common Good?

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The concept of “commons” is complex; it may relate to property regimes, rules of use and access, recognition of collective importance, or a mixture of these. This paper explores the arguments—developed by a growing epistemic community—to promote mountains as global common goods within the third category. This process may be viewed as starting with the UN Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) in 1992, and continuing, in particular, through the International Year of Mountains 2002. It has been supported and advanced by focused publications, the establishment of global networks, and advances in technology. Specific arguments state that mountains are important because: they provide ecosystem services; are vulnerable to climate change; are home to a significant part of humanity, including many who are disadvantaged; and are centers of cultural, religious, and ethnic diversity. Nevertheless, this proposal has been contested within the scientific community and the implications for mountain people remain to be discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Debarbieux, B., & Price, M. F. (2016). Mountain Regions: A Global Common Good? In Perspectives on Geographical Marginality (Vol. 1, pp. 45–53). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32649-8_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free