Moving Electronic Medical Records Upstream

  • Gottlieb L
  • Tirozzi K
  • Manchanda R
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The growing amount of data in operational electronic health record (EHR) systems provides unprecedented opportunity for its re-use for many tasks, including comparative effectiveness research (CER). However, there are many caveats to the use of such data. EHR data from clinical settings may be inaccurate, incomplete, transformed in ways that undermine their meaning, unrecoverable for research, of unknown provenance, of insufficient granularity, and incompatible with research protocols. However, the quantity and real-world nature of these data provide impetus for their use, and we develop a list of caveats to inform would-be users of such data as well as provide an informatics roadmap that aims to insure this opportunity to augment CER can be best leveraged. Publisher's

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gottlieb, L. M., Tirozzi, K. J., Manchanda, R., Burns, A. R., & Sandel, M. T. (2015). Moving Electronic Medical Records Upstream. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 48(2), 215–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.07.009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free