Mutually exclusive utilization of P(R) and P(RM) promoters in bacteriophage 434 O(R)

  • Xu J
  • Koudelka G
  • 6


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 12


    Citations of this article.


Establishment and maintenance of a lysogen of the lambdoid bacteriophage 434 require that the 434 repressor both activate transcription from the P(RM) promoter and repress transcription from the divergent P(R) promoter. Several lines of evidence indicate that the 434 repressor activates initiation of P(RM) transcription by occupying a binding site adjacent to the P(RM) promoter and directly contacting RNA polymerase. The overlapping architecture of the P(RM) and P(R) promoters suggests that an RNA polymerase bound at P(R) may repress P(RM) transcription initiation. Hence, part of the stimulatory effect of the 434 repressor may be relief of interference between RNA polymerase binding to the P(RM) promoter and to the P(R) promoter. Consistent with this proposal, we show that the repressor cannot activate P(RM) transcription if RNA polymerase binds at P(R) prior to addition of the 434 repressor. However, unlike the findings with the related lambda phage, formation of RNA polymerase promoter complexes at P(RM) and at P(R) apparently are mutually exclusive. We find that the RNA polymerase-mediated inhibition of repressor-stimulated P(RM) transcription requires the presence of an open complex at P(R). Taken together, these results indicate that establishment of an open complex at P(R) directly prevents formation of an RNA polymerase-P(RM) complex.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free