Nasal decolonization of Staphylococcus aureus with mupirocin: Strengths, weaknesses and future prospects

  • Coates T
  • Bax R
  • Coates A
  • 94

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 95

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus in the nose is a risk factor for endogenous staphylococcal infection. UK guidelines recommend the use of mupirocin for nasal decolonization in certain groups of patients colonized with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Mupirocin is effective at removing S. aureus from the nose over a few weeks, but relapses are common within several months. There are only a few prospective randomized clinical trials that have been completed with sufficient patients, but those that have been reported suggest that clearance of S. aureus from the nose is beneficial in some patient groups for the reduction in the incidence of nosocomial infections. There is no convincing evidence that mupirocin treatment reduces the incidence of surgical site infection. New antibiotics are needed to decolonize the nose because bacterial resistance to mupirocin is rising, and so it will become less effective. Furthermore, a more bactericidal antibiotic than mupirocin is needed, on the grounds that it might reduce the relapse rate, and so clear the patient of MRSA for a longer period of time than mupirocin.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Antimicrobials
  • Infection control
  • MRSA
  • Nosocomial
  • Surgical

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • T. Coates

  • R. Bax

  • A. Coates

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free