Negational categorization and intergroup behavior

  • Zhong C
  • Phillips K
  • Leonardelli G
 et al. 
  • 68


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 19


    Citations of this article.


Individuals define themselves, at times, as who they are (e.g., a psychologist) and, at other times, as who they are not (e.g., not an economist). Drawing on social identity, optimal distinctiveness, and balance theories, four studies examined the nature of negational identity relative to affirmational identity. One study explored the conditions that increase negational identification and found that activating the need for distinctiveness increased the accessibility of negational identities. Three additional studies revealed that negational categorization increased outgroup derogation relative to affirmational categorization and the authors argue that this effect is at least partially due to a focus on contrasting the self from the outgroup under negational categorization. Consistent with this argument, outgroup derogation following negational categorization was mitigated when connections to similar others were highlighted. By distinguishing negational identity from affirmational identity, a more complete picture of collective identity and intergroup behavior can start to emerge.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Ingroup favoritism
  • Intergroup behavior
  • Negational categorization
  • Outgroup derogation
  • Social identity

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Chen Bo Zhong

  • Katherine W. Phillips

  • Geoffrey J. Leonardelli

  • Adam D. Galinsky

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free