New tools for the study of Alzheimer's disease: What are biomarkers and morphometric markers teaching us?

12Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Early detection is vital in the quest to develop a cure for Alzheimer's disease (AD), and CSF biomarkers (A?42, t-tau, p-tau) and MRI morphometry distinguish AD from healthy controls. A?42 and neurodegenerative biomarkers may precede clinical symptoms, but it is not clear whether AD invariably follows and whether neuropsychological tests are as sensitive. A?42 is related to plaque burden, which was assumed to be the main cause of AD. Evidence is now pointing to other forms of A?, for example, soluble A? oligomers, and it is possible that plaques are secondary rather than causative to neuronal damage. This makes it less obvious that CSF A?42 necessarily is the most potent marker. Atrophy has been regarded as a downstream event, but novel MRI analysis techniques detect atrophy at a stage where the cognitive reductions are small and possibly reversible, and MRI is superior to CSF biomarkers in the prediction of cognitive decline. The impact of biomarkers may be dynamic; changed A?42 is seen in cognitively normal, while atrophy causes decrements later. In conclusion, CSF and MRI biomarkers are extremely important, but it is not known whether they can distinguish events that will lead to AD from events that will not before cognitive reductions are measurable. © SAGE Publications 2011.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fjell, A. M., & Walhovd, K. B. (2011). New tools for the study of Alzheimer’s disease: What are biomarkers and morphometric markers teaching us? Neuroscientist, 17(5), 592–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858410392586

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free