Nonexperimental versus Experimental Estimates of Earnings Impacts

  • Glazerman S
  • Levy D
  • Myers D
  • 134

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 127

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

To assess nonexperimental (NX) evaluation methods in to context of welfare, job training, and employment services programs, the authors reexamined the results of twelve case studies intended to replicate impact estimates from an experimental evaluation by using NX methods. They found that the NX methods sometimes came close to replicating experimentally derived results but often produced estimates that differed by policy-relevant margins, which the authors interpret as estimates of bias. Although the authors identified several study design factors associated with smaller discrepancies, no combination of factors would consistently eliminate discrepancies. Even with a large number of impact estimates, the positive and negative bias estimates did not always cancel each other out. Thus, it was difficult to identify an aggregation strategy that consistently removed bias while answering a focused question about earnings impacts of a program. They conclude that although the empirical evidence from this literature can be used in the context of training and welfare programs to improve NX research designs, it cannot on its own justify the use of such designs. CR - Copyright © 2003 American Academy of Political and Social Science

Author-supplied keywords

  • Design replication
  • Nonexperimental
  • Quasi-experimental

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Steven Glazerman

  • Dan M. Levy

  • David Myers

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free