Non-HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B in the dyslipidemic classification of type 2 diabetic patients

47Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE - To compare non-HDL cholesterol (HDLc) and apolipoprotein B (apoB) in the identification of nonconventional high-risk dyslipidemic phenotypes in type 2 diabetic patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Total cholesterol and triglycerides, HDLc, LDL cholesterol, non-HDLc, apolipoprotein B (apoB), and LDL size were determined in 122 type 2 diabetic patients (68% male, aged 59.6 ± 9.7 years, and HbA1c 7.5% [range 5.2-16.0]). They were then classified as normo- and hypertriglyceridemic if their triglyceride concentrations were below/above 2.25 mmol/l, as normo/hyper-non-HDLc if non-HDLc concentrations were below/above 4.13 mmol/l, and as normo- and hyperapoB if apoB concentrations were below/above 0.97 g/l. Both classifications were compared (concordance assessed with the κ index), and low HDLc and LDL phenotype B were identified in each category. RESULTS - A total of 26 patients were hypertriglyceridemic and 96 were normotriglyceridemic. All hypertriglyceridemic subjects had increased non-HDLc, whereas 24 had increased apoB (κ = 0.95). In the normotriglyceridemic group, 44 had increased non-HDLc, 68 had increased apoB, and 25 of the 52 patients with normal non-HDLc had increased apoB (κ = 0.587). Low HDLc and LDL phenotype B were similarly distributed into the equivalent categories. CONCLUSIONS - Non-HDLc and apoB are equivalent risk markers in hypertriglyceridemic patients, but apoB identifies additional patients with high-risk dyslipidemic phenotypes in normotriglyceridemic type 2 diabetic patients. © 2003 by the American Diabetes Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wagner, A. M., Perez, A., Zapico, E., & Ordóñez-Llanos, J. (2003). Non-HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B in the dyslipidemic classification of type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care, 26(7), 2048–2051. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.7.2048

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free