A note on P-values under group sequential testing and nonproportional hazards

  • Gillen D
  • Emerson S
  • 9

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 6

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Summary. Group sequential designs are often used for periodically assessing treatment efficacy during the course of a clinical trial. Following a group sequential test, P-values computed under the assumption that the data were gathered according to a fixed sample design are no longer uniformly distributed under the null hypothesis of no treatment effect. Various sample space orderings have been proposed for computing proper P-values following a group sequential test. Although many of the proposed orderings have been compared in the setting of time-invariant treatment effects, little attention has been given to their performance when the effect of treatment within an individual varies over time. Our interest here is to compare two of the most commonly used methods for computing proper P-values following a group sequential test, based upon the analysis time (AT) and Z-statistic orderings, with respect to resulting power functions when treatment effects on survival are delayed. Power under the AT ordering is shown to be heavily influenced by the presence of a delayed treatment effect, while power functions corresponding to the Z-statistic ordering remain robust under time-varying treatment effects.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Censored data
  • Clinical trials
  • Nonproportional hazards
  • Ordering
  • Sequential tests

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Daniel L. Gillen

  • Scott S. Emerson

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free