Obstinate and inefficient: Why member states do not comply with European law

  • Börzel T
  • Hofmann T
  • Panke D
 et al. 
  • 277

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 78

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

This article seeks to explain cross-country variation in noncompliance with European law. Although noncompliance has not significantly increased over time, some European Union member states violate European law more frequently than others.To account for the observed variance, the authors draw on three prominent approaches widely used in the compliance literature enforcement, management, and legitimacy. They develop hypotheses for each of these approaches before combining them in theoretically consistent ways. They empirically test their hypotheses using a comprehensive data set of more than 6,300 violations of European law.The findings highlight the importance of combining the enforcement and management approaches. Powerful member states are most likely to violate European law, whereas the best compliers are small countries with efficient bureaucracies. Yet administrative capacity also matters for powerful member states. The United Kingdom is much more compliant than Italy, which commands similar political power but whose bureaucracy is far less efficient.

Author-supplied keywords

  • European Union
  • compliance
  • enforcement
  • legitimacy
  • management

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Tanja A. Börzel

  • Tobias Hofmann

  • Diana Panke

  • Carina Sprungk

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free