One hundred free DIEP flap breast reconstructions: A personal experience

504Citations
Citations of this article
127Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous (TRAM) flap has been the gold standard for breast reconstruction until recently. Not only autologous but also immediate reconstructions are now preferred to offer the patient a natural and cosmetically acceptable result. This study summarises the prospectively gathered data of 100 free DIEP flaps used for breast reconstruction in 87 patients. Primary reconstructions were done in 35% of the patients. Well-known risk factors for free-flap breast reconstruction were present: smokers 23%, obesity 25%, abdominal scarring 28% and previous radiotherapy 45%. Free DIEP flaps vascularised by a single (52%), two (39%) or three (9%) perforators were preferentially anastomosed to the internal mammary vessels at the level of the third costochondral junction. Of 74 unilateral DIEP flaps, 41 (55%) flaps were well vascularised in zone IV. Two flaps necrosed totally. Partial flap loss and fat necrosis occurred in 7% and 6% of all flaps, respectively. One patient presented with a unilateral abdominal bulge. Mean operating time was 6 h 12 min for unilateral reconstruction and mean hospital stay was 7.9 days. These data indicate that the free DIEP flap is a new but reliable and safe technique for autologous breast reconstruction. This flap offers the patient the same advantages as the TRAM flap and discards the most important disadvantages of the myocutaneous flap by preserving the continuity of the rectus muscle. The donor site morbidity is reduced, a sensate reinnervation is possible, postoperative pain is less, recovery is quicker and hospital stay is reduced. The more complex nature of this type of surgery, leading to increased operating time, is balanced by the permanent and gratifying results achieved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Blondeel, P. N. (1999). One hundred free DIEP flap breast reconstructions: A personal experience. British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 52(2), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjps.1998.3033

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free