Skip to content

Open access publishing: The evidence from the authors

Nicholas D, Rowlands I ...see all

Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 31, issue 3 (2005) pp. 179-181

  • 30

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 19

    Citations

    Citations of this article.
  • 2.0k

    Views

    ScienceDirect users who have downloaded this article.
Sign in to save reference

Abstract

Many organizations have employed the concepts of [`]asset specificity' and [`]uncertainty' from transaction cost theory (TCT), and [`]strategic resources' from the resource-based view (RBV) as drivers of their information systems (ISs) sourcing decisions. They, however, face a dilemma when TCT and the RBV suggest different sourcing alternatives. The study identifies contexts where sourcing decisions made based on these two theories differ, and examines which theory accounts better for an organization's sourcing decisions. Results show that a high-specificity asset is a major driver of sourcing decisions. It overpowers the effects of uncertainty on sourcing decisions; while a non-strategic resource has no impact on sourcing decisions. In particular, where the two theories make conflicting predictions, organizations should not always outsource non-strategic resources. Non-strategic resources that involve high specificity should be retained internally. The paper concludes with implications for academics and practitioners, and a discussion of future research directions.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text

Authors

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below