Open, semi-open and closed innovators: Towards an explanation of degree of openness

  • Barge-Gil A
  • 125

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 53

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

There is much controversy in the literature over the relationship between the openness of firms' innovation strategies and firm characteristics such as size, R&D intensity and sector. We argue that the controversy arises because, both theoretically and empirically, only a binary, open vs. closed, strategy has been considered. In this paper, we distinguish among three firm strategies: open, semi-open and closed, drawing upon a panel of Spanish firms (2004?2006) using data from Community Innovation Survey (CIS)-type surveys, and two different indicators of openness. Our results show that open innovators are smaller and less R&D intensive than semi-open ones, although larger and more R&D intensive than closed innovators. These results reduce some of the controversies, and show that two conflicting forces, absorptive capacity and a ?need? effect, are at stake in open innovation strategies.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Collaboration
  • Open innovation strategies
  • R and D
  • Sector
  • Size
  • Technology policy

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free