Operator volume and outcomes in 12,998 percutaneous coronary interventions. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group.

  • McGrath P
  • Wennberg D
  • Malenka D
 et al. 
  • 10


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A


    Citations of this article.


OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether there is a relation between operator volume and outcomes for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). BACKGROUND: A 1993 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force stated that cardiologists should perform > or = 75 procedures/year to maintain competency in PCIs; however, there were limited data available to support this statement. METHODS: Data were collected from 1990 through 1993 on 12,988 PCIs (12,118 consecutive hospital admissions) performed by 31 cardiologists at two hospitals in New Hampshire and two in Maine and one hospital in Massachusetts supporting these procedures. Operators were categorized into terciles based on annualized volume of procedures. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to control for case-mix. Successful outcomes included angiographic success (all lesions attempted dilated to < 50% residual stenosis) and clinical success (at least one lesion dilated to < 50% residual stenosis and no adverse outcomes). In-hospital adverse outcomes included coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), myocardial infarction (MI) and death. RESULTS: After adjustment for case-mix, higher angiographic (low, middle and high terciles: 84.7%, 86.1% and 90.3%, p-trend 0.006) and clinical success rates (85.8%, 88.0% and 90.7%, p-trend 0.025), with fewer referrals to CABG (4.54%, 3.75% and 2.49%, p-trend

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • P D McGrath

  • D E Wennberg

  • D J Malenka

  • M a Kellett

  • T J Ryan

  • J R O'Meara

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free