Organisational whistleblowing policies: Making employees responsible or liable?

  • Tsahuridu E
  • Vandekerckhove W
  • 70

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 39

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

This paper explores the possible impact of the recent legal developments on organizational whistleblowing on the autonomy and responsibility of whistleblowers. In the past thirty years numerous pieces of legislation have been passed to offer protection to whistleblowers from retaliation for disclosing organisational wrongdoing. An area that remains uncertain in relation to whistleblowing and its related policies in organisations, is whether these policies actually increase the individualisation of work, allowing employees to behave in accordance with their conscience and in line with societal expectations or whether they are another management tool to control employees and protect organisations from them. The assumptions of whistleblower protection with regard to moral autonomy are examined in order to clarify the purpose of whistleblower protection at work. The two extreme positions in the discourse of whistleblowing are that whistleblowing legislation and policies either aim to enable individual responsibility and moral autonomy at work, or they aim to protect organisations by allowing them to control employees and make them liable for ethics at work.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Ethical distance
  • Moral agency
  • Moral autonomy
  • Whistleblowing

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Eva E. Tsahuridu

  • Wim Vandekerckhove

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free