Originally published as Volume 1, Issue 8476STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT

  • Bland J
  • Altman D
ISSN: 0140-6736
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In clinical measurement comparison of a new measurement technique with an established one is often needed to see whether they agree sufficiently for the new to replace the old. Such investigations are often analysed inappropriately, notably by using correlation coefficients. The use of correlation is misleading. An alternative approach, based on graphical techniques and simple calculations, is described, together with the relation between this analysis and the assessment of repeatability.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bland, J. M., & Altman, DouglasG. (1986). Originally published as Volume 1, Issue 8476STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT. The Lancet, 327(8476), 307–310. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673686908378

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free