Overcoming technical variation and biological variation in quantitative proteomics

  • Molloy M
  • Brzezinski E
  • Hang J
 et al. 
  • 120


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 220


    Citations of this article.


Quantitative proteomics investigates physiology at the molecular level by measuring relative differences in protein expression between samples under different experimental conditions. A major obstacle to reliably determining quantitative changes in protein expression is to overcome error imposed by technical variation and biological variation. In drug discovery and development the issue of biological variation often rises in concordance with the developmental stage of research, spanning from in vitro assays to clinical trials. In this paper we present case studies to raise awareness to the issues of technical variation and biological variation and the impact this places on applying quantitative proteomics. We defined the degree of technical variation from the process of two-dimensional electrophoresis as 20-30% coefficient of variation. On the other hand, biological variation observed experiment-to-experiment showed a broader degree of variation depending upon the sample type. This was demonstrated with case studies where variation was monitored across experiments with bacteria, established cell lines, primary cultures, and with drug treated human subjects. We discuss technical variation and biological variation as key factors to consider during experimental design, and offer insight into preparing experiments that overcome this challenge to provide statistically significant outcomes for conducting quantitative proteomic research.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Reproducibility
  • Sample size
  • Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis
  • Variation

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text


  • Mark P. Molloy

  • Erin E. Brzezinski

  • Junqi Hang

  • Michael T. McDowell

  • Ruth A. VanBogelen

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free