PADUA: A protocol for argumentation dialogue using association rules

  • Wardeh M
  • Bench-Capon T
  • Coenen F
  • 14


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 16


    Citations of this article.


We describe PADUA, a protocol designed to support two agents debating a classification by offering arguments based on association rules mined from individual datasets. We motivate the style of argumentation supported by PADUA, and describe the protocol. We discuss the strategies and tactics that can be employed by agents participating in a PADUA dialogue. PADUA is applied to a typical problem in the classification of routine claims for a hypothetical welfare benefit. We particularly address the problems that arise from the extensive number of misclassified examples typically found in such domains, where the high error rate is a widely recognised problem. We give examples of the use of PADUA in this domain, and explore in particular the effect of intermediate predicates. We have also done a large scale evaluation designed to test the effectiveness of using PADUA to detect misclassified examples, and to provide a comparison with other classification systems. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]

Author-supplied keywords

  • Argumentation dialogue
  • Association rules
  • Classification
  • Dialogue games

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text


  • Maya Wardeh

  • Trevor Bench-Capon

  • Frans Coenen

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free