Skip to content
Journal article

Paradoxical effects of thought suppression

Wegner D, Schneider D, Carter S, White T...(+4 more)

Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, vol. 53, issue 1 (1987) pp. 5-13

  • 8

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A

    Citations

    Citations of this article.
  • N/A

    Views

    ScienceDirect users who have downloaded this article.
Sign in to save reference

Abstract

In a first experiment, subjects verbalizing the stream of consciousness for a 5-min period were asked to try not to think of a white bear, but to ring a bell in case they did. As indicated both by mentions and by bell rings, they were unable to suppress the thought as instructed. On being asked after this suppression task to think about the white bear for a 5-min period, these subjects showed significantly more tokens of thought about the bear than did subjects who were asked to think about a white bear from the outset. These observations suggest that attempted thought suppression has paradoxical effects as a self-control strategy, perhaps even producing the very obsession or preoccupation that it is directed against. A second experiment replicated these findings and showed that subjects given a specific thought to use as a distracter during suppression were less likely to exhibit later preoccupation with the thought to be suppressed. ((c) 1997 APA/PsycINFO, all rights reserved) Subjects verbalizing the stream of consciousness for a 5-min period were asked to try not to think of a white bear, but to ring a bell in case they did. As indicated both by mentions and by bell rings, they were unable to suppress the thought as instructed. On being asked after this suppression task to think about the white bear for a 5-minute period, these subjects showed significantly more tokens of thought about the white bear than did subjects who were asked to think about a white bear from the outset. These observations suggest that attempted thought suppression has paradoxical effects as a self-control strategy, perhaps even producing the very obsession or preoccupation that it is directed against. A second experiment replicated these findings and showed that subjects given a specific thought to use as a distracter were less likely to exhibit later preoccupation with the thought to be suppressed. Suggests that a cognitive mechanism mirrors or underlies other emotional, psychological, and behavioral phenomena. Suggests that suppression may block a natural tendency to find meaning in traumatic events and this can hamper effective coping processes and lead to other health problems (relates to Lewinian tension systems interpretations ).

Author-supplied keywords

  • Cognitions
  • Cognitive Processes [2340]
  • Self Control
  • thought suppression during stream of consciousness

Find this document

There are no full text links

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below