Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized study.

  • TS W
  • Bentley G
  • Waters T
 et al. 
  • 2

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Background: Anterior knee pain following total knee arthroplasty is a common complaint and typically is attributed to the patellofemoral joint. The purpose of the present study was to compare the outcome of resurfacing and nonresurfacing of the patella, particularly with regard to anterior knee pain, and to clarify the indications for patellar resurfacing at the time of total knee arthroplasty.Methods: We performed a prospective, randomized study of 514 consecutive primary press-fit condylar total knee replacements. The patients were randomized to either resurfacing or retention of the patella. They were also randomized to either a cruciate-substituting or a cruciate-retaining prosthesis as part of a separate trial. The mean duration of follow-up was 5.3 years (range, two to 8.5 years), and the patients were assessed with use of the Knee Society rating, a clinical anterior knee pain score, and the British Orthopaedic Association patient-satisfaction score. The assessment was performed without the examiner knowing whether the patella had been resurfaced. At the time of follow-up, there were 474 knees. Thirty-five patients who had a bilateral knee replacement underwent resurfacing on one side only.Results: The overall prevalence of anterior knee pain was 25.1% (fifty-eight of 231 knees) in the nonresurfacing group, compared with 5.3% (thirteen of 243 knees) in the resurfacing group (p < 0.0001). There was one case of component loosening. Ten of eleven patients who underwent secondary resurfacing had complete relief of anterior knee pain. The overall postoperative knee scores were lower in the nonresurfacing group, and the difference was significant among patients with osteoarthritis (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference between the resurfacing and nonresurfacing groups with regard to the postoperative function score. Patients who had a bilateral knee replacement were more likely to prefer the resurfaced side.Conclusions: As the present study showed a significantly higher rate of anterior knee pain following arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing, we recommend patellar resurfacing at the time of total knee replacement when technically possible.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Activities of Daily Living -- Evaluation
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and Over
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
  • Chi Square Test
  • Clinical Assessment Tools
  • Data Analysis Software
  • Descriptive Statistics
  • Double-Blind Studies
  • Female
  • Functional Assessment
  • Funding Source
  • Human
  • Knee -- Radiography
  • Male
  • Middle Age
  • Orthopedic Surgery -- Methods
  • Pain -- Prevention and Control
  • Pain Measurement
  • Patella -- Surgery
  • Patient Satisfaction -- Evaluation
  • Power Analysis
  • Pretest-Posttest Design
  • Prospective Studies
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Random Assignment
  • Range of Motion -- Evaluation
  • Treatment Complications, Delayed -- Prevention and
  • Treatment Outcomes

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Waters TS

  • G Bentley

  • T S Waters

  • G Bentley

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free